
"One of the things my team has been working to enable has been the ability for .NET developers to download and browse the source code of the .NET Framework libraries, and to easily enable debugging support in them. Today I'm excited to announce that we'll be
providing this with the .NET 3.5 and VS 2008 release later this year. We'll begin by offering the source code (with source file comments included) for the .NET Base Class Libraries, ASP.NET, Windows Forms, ADO.NET, XML, and WPF. We'll then be adding more libraries in the months ahead (including WCF, Workflow, and LINQ). The source code will be released under the
Microsoft Reference License."
Member since:
2006-12-28
Which side of their reputation are you talking about?
The side that is known for keeping interoperability information under lock and key so they can continue to monopolies their position as the world's no1 desktop?
The side that is known to invite partners to develop for their platform only to release a competing product and bundle it for free with their OS?
The side that bullies OEMs into offering systems with only their OS preinstalled?
The side that is known for trying to take over the internet with an inferior product, then providing operating systems without the security mechanisms needed to securely connect to said internet there by leaving the door open for scrip kiddies to run riot causing millions of dollars in downtime and damages?
How about the side that bankrolls other companies to threatens the only thing it can't buy, steal from or muscle out of the IT industry, i.e. Linux, and when that fails, starts threatening with bogus IP violation charges it is unwilling (read unable) to provide any evidence for?
If MS is damaging it's reputation, surely that's a good thing?