Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Oct 2007 15:23 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Permalink for comment 276528
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I was thinking, If addressing is such a huge cost, why not avoid it entirely.
What if the memory modules just cycled through it's rows as fast as it could letting any interested device do it's reading or writing at the right time.
Waiting for the memory to cycle through would be murder on latency though. But in an era of multicores and parallel execution maybe the right blend of multitasking and ingenious algorithms for memory allocation in the OS could make it viable.
What do you think?