Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Oct 2007 13:56 UTC, submitted by Witek Wasilewski
Permalink for comment 279169
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
/quote/But as a desktop platform, there are places where either a new release forgets to maintain backward compatibility compiler flags or old, important bugs are swept under the rug./quote/
And this is the problem with Ubuntu in a nutshell. You have to upgrade to get newer versions of applications and when you do you're left crossing your fingers hoping that there's no regression.
But regression is a mainstay for Ubuntu. I used to run it and features that worked like a champ under Dapper, let's say, were horribly supported or not at all supported under Edgy. The common response is that Dapper was a LTS release and was meant to be stable. But if Ubuntu wants to claim the desktop space *every* release must be stable and have little to no regression. Referring back to a release that is almost 18 months old as the answer for stability is really no answer at all.
Ubuntu and its derivatives need to seriously consider coming out with releases every 9 months or so instead of 6 months. Oh wait, then the users would have to go 9 months before their apps are upgraded.
So we are left with a conundrum: either extend the release times and use older versions of apps longer or release every six months, adding tons of eye candy and hope there is little to no regression.
A bit if a trade off is it not? And we wonder what all the hype is about?
(Typing from a Slackware 12 installation running the latest office apps.)