Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 26th Oct 2007 05:34 UTC, submitted by WillM
Permalink for comment 281055
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Quite frankly, you haven't really used it. I can't speak about Zenworks-for-Linux
Since the original post was about building Zenworks on Linux, yes, that's what I was talking about.
which I hear exists, but Zenworks on for netware 5.x/6.x managing Windows clients is simply unbeatable
My advice? Stay on 6.5.
And about groupwise... maybe it's not perfect, but if your network is built around eDirectory it is the best thing going.
The problem is, most networks aren't built around eDirectory, they're built around Active Directory, since it is a prerequisite of managing Windows. Most are using Exchange.
Also, do not underestimate directory integrated services.
I don't, which is why most Linux server installations hit a brick wall. The vast majority aren't going to buy Novell's software on top. Either you get your hands dirty with OpenLDAP, which doesn't have a decent, default installation anywhere, or you get your hands just slightly less dirty with Red Hat Directory Server (Fedora Directory Server), which again, doesn't have a decent default installation anywhere. Additionally, very little is integrated with it until you go and do it yourself.