Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 27th Oct 2007 22:34 UTC, submitted by Kishe
Legal When her 0.29" family video was taken down by YouTube on the request of Universal MPG, the affected mother of two struck back with a lawsuit against Universal with the help of the EFF. While technically her family video might have been a copyright infringement as she had no license to include Prince's song as a background score, it is encouraging to see the public fighting back against restrictive laws that get in the way of their every day lives. My Take: I stated my own opinion on the matter on my personal blog.
Permalink for comment 281307
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
from your blog to here
by mikesum32 on Sun 28th Oct 2007 00:22 UTC
Member since:

Fair use has been upheld by the courts. It's real, so quit saying it isn't (again!). She could file a counter notice to have her copyrighted work restored.

I checked the story, and she did, and her work was restored to youtube. So, in fact, she won. Now the EFF is suing for abuse of DMCA take-down notices. So it wasn't infringement.

I agree that copyrights need to be re-thought. I also think patents need to be re-thought too. I support copyright reform, but it makes me mad when someone on my side bends the facts to get sympathy or make a point. She won, so there is fair use. It's not simple, easy, or automatic, but it exists.

The proof is that the video is back up.

I don't know if Prince is scouring the internet for "abuse". More likely it was a over-zealous lawyer, someone using a keyword search and sending a DMCA take-down to everyone without checking the facts. Doing that is probably illegal. I hope the EFF tears the record label a new asshole.

Give me a less rich record label, and a bunch of over-zealous lawyers in the unemployment line and I'll be happier.

I tried posting this to your blog, but it isn't working.

Reply Score: 7