Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2007 16:17 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Permalink for comment 284370
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-02-17
This reasoning only applies for clusters.
From the article: "A total of 406 systems are labeled as clusters, making this the most common architecture in the TOP500 with a stable share of 81.2 percent."
Only a cluster system would require a large number of licenses.
Windows writes itself out of contention to run on the 18.8% of top 500 supercomputers which are not clusters because neither the x86 nor the x86_64 architectures are supercomputer CPUs.
Or, stated another way, Linux wins this race because of two main reasons:
(1) it doesn't have per-copy license fees, and
(2) it is way, way more portable to different architectures.
Nothing scales the way that Linux does.
Edited 2007-11-14 08:11