Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Nov 2007 15:46 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces This is the sixth article in a series on common usability and graphical user interface related terms [part I | part II | part III | part IV | part V]. On the internet, and especially in forum discussions like we all have here on OSNews, it is almost certain that in any given discussion, someone will most likely bring up usability and GUI related terms - things like spatial memory, widgets, consistency, Fitts' Law, and more. The aim of this series is to explain these terms, learn something about their origins, and finally rate their importance in the field of usability and (graphical) user interface design. In part VI, we focus on the dock.
Permalink for comment 285134
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
tupp
Member since:
2006-11-12

Today, the definition seems to be; an icon bar where the same icons are used both to show running apps and to launch them.

You have just described the RISC OS Icon Bar, from 1987 -- preceding NeXTSTEP by two years.


Traditional taskbars don't fit this description. So there is at least one difference right there.

My experience is that Windows 95 and Windows 98 fit this description -- I could drag application icons to the taskbar and if an application was running a rectangle with an icon and the applicatin's title would appear. The Gnome and KDE taskbars exhibit the same behaviour.


Well, in NeXTSTEP, nothing appeared in the Dock at all. You had to drag it there to dock it.

Is it an advantage to lack an indicator for an active application that one forgot to drag to the dock?


By "quicklaunch" I meant the Quick Launch toolbar.

Not familiar with the Quick Launch toolbar.

Edited 2007-11-19 09:47

Reply Parent Score: 1