Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Nov 2007 15:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 285142
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Pardon? no one argues that Steve (personally) or Apple invented it - what they did do well is the popularisation of the said technology.
Take a look at Japanese electronic companies like Sony; very few of the ideas that came out from Sony in the early years were as a by-product of in house R&D.
LCD's for example, was an American invention, it was the fact that it took until the 1980s when american companies finally realised the link between R&D, competitive advantage and producing products - where they finally protected the technology they developed.
Nothing today is original; the vast majority of it has already been conceptualised years ago - perpendicular recording which has finally being used in hard disks today was developed over 40 years ago - for instance.
Lets not try to start a turf war over who invested who - the question should be who implemented the best - that is, reducing the number of down sides.