Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Nov 2007 15:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 285342
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
Yes, progman.exe was included in Windows 95. However, it broke a lot of built-in features like the recycle bin and network neighbourhood, as these were hooks into explorer.exe.
You could also run a lot of different shells on Windows 9x (Litestep and Darkstep being the two most popular). But, these also broke things that were hooked directly into explorer.exe.
If MS had properly separated the GUI shell from system services (like in Win3.x), then running alternate shells would have been a much smoother/easier thing to do.