Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Nov 2007 15:46 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces This is the sixth article in a series on common usability and graphical user interface related terms [part I | part II | part III | part IV | part V]. On the internet, and especially in forum discussions like we all have here on OSNews, it is almost certain that in any given discussion, someone will most likely bring up usability and GUI related terms - things like spatial memory, widgets, consistency, Fitts' Law, and more. The aim of this series is to explain these terms, learn something about their origins, and finally rate their importance in the field of usability and (graphical) user interface design. In part VI, we focus on the dock.
Permalink for comment 285413
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

Before we start, your post score was at 0 - I 've added a point onto it by virtue of the fact that I don't like seeing discussion and debate killed because of the 'tyranny of the masses'. I would sooner see your unpopular post and allow me to dissect it than have it buried by those who take a militant attitude to their platform.

1) Don't confuse the ranting of a few fanboys for the vast majority of Mac people who know their computer history. To claim that 'Steve invented the GUI' is as stupid as claiming that 'without Microsoft, there would be no PC revolution".

No one owes Steve Jobs or Bill Gates (or their companies) anything; they aren't prophets, they aren't special beings or organisations whom, if they suddenly went, all innovation would cease to exist. They're merely companies filled with humans using their knowledge to create things; if those specific companies didn't exist, others would pop up.

2) Learn English, I put personally in the bracket as to infer that he personally didn't sit in a lab and create it. English isn't a difficult language, please spend time learning it before butchering it or worse, asking stupid questions.

3) There are loads of things which have been invented and never attributed to the original person; take Kellogg's cereal for example - no one ever demands that John Harvey Kellogg should be venerated - its always his brother which has the kudos for creating the Kellogg's we know today.

There is no use pointing out who created it if you don't acknowledge who put the money, marketing and 'soft capital' behind it to turn it from an idea on the drawing board into a usable and marketable product.

4) I don't know where you history come from but the Europeans have a had a heck of alot greater success internationally when it comes to commercialising consumer products. Most things in the US which people rant on about never make it outside the boarders.

Heck, there have been studies after studies regarding Europe vs. America in regards to consumer products - ignore them if you want and keep living in the deluded idea of the 'star spangled banner'.

5) Name one product out there that is completely and new an innovative - that is, created in a clean room without the input of any existing ideas or technology?

Everything today is built off the ideas of years ago; its the old story of 'on the shoulders of giants we stand'.

6) You have major English issues; learn the difference between implementation and popularisation - the two are very different. Creation, implementation and popularisation can occur completely separate from each other.

Reply Parent Score: 3