Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 24th Nov 2007 23:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 286663
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Miguel, talking from his position as founder of gnumeric, says that OOXML has a far more usable spec for spreadsheet apps...
Miguel can say this all he wants, but it isn't backed up by facts. Open Office, KOffice, Lotus and Google Docs are all implementing various spreadsheet features like the often criticised formulas part and people are improving it as part of something called a community.
...but that it is really hard to say one spec is better then the other.
There is ample evidence that it is going to be as close to impossible as possible to get a 100%, complete implementation of OOXML that is interoperable with Office 2007. You and Miguel should read it, because we're not going to go over it again.
There are really only three main areas not open in OOXML, that is backwards compatibility with binary office formats, clip art, and encryption.
OOXML is merely various parts of the old binary format thrown into a XML format with most of the implementation not specified. That much is obvious when you read it. Backwards compatibility is a central reason why Microsoft has justified OOXML, clip art is very much a part of the spec, and it is exceptionally inadequate for an international standard as most of it is westernised, and where's the interoperability if you can't open an encrypted document?
Saying something is open does not make it so, but then, that's all the OOXML proponents seem to have in response.
That is far from the popular opinion that OOXML is basically an XML wrapper around binary blobs.
You obviously haven't read the spec documents. Some light reading:
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.h...
Very little of the useful information in a file is encapsulated in XML, and XML doesn't make it usable either.