Linked by David Adams on Fri 30th Nov 2007 19:18 UTC, submitted by pablo_marx
Permalink for comment 287760
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-04-05
Squeak? Javascript? FAT as filesystem? this is horrible!
Simplicity and broad adoption.
(yeah, broad adoption; Squeak is *big* at Disney.)
What makes you think it's a next-gen system? It's a research system. And you know what my suspicion is? That's Nintendo answer for homebrew apps on the Wii.
FAT access for the SD card: check.
Interpreted languages to sandbox the development away from the "crown jewels" (i.e., the encryption keys), and to ensure portability between the development environment and the target environment: check.
Use of a graphics library that can make great use of hardware acceleration: check.
But of course I'd rather have Lua instead of Javascript; Lua is much, *much* bigger among the game development community, so it's definitely a wiser choice. Maybe in the near future, who knows?
?!
I think you're mixing the facts here.
Uh... Noooo? The only Carbon apps you see nowadays on Mac OS X are those based on large existing codebases that started back on Mac OS 7, like those by Adobe and Microsoft, and apps ported over from Linux and use the eventual toolkit that doesn't bind to Cocoa (like Qt), but those are really few and far between (and to be honest I've never seen a single native Mac OS X app based on Qt).
Not a *single* interesting Mac OS X-exclusive app is written in Carbon.
Careful, you're talking about Nintendo here. You know, that little company in Japan that simply prints money out of a little thing called Nintendo DS, as if the Wii wasn't enough?
Edit: the obligatory Lua pimping
Edited 2007-11-30 20:21