Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Dec 2007 16:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 289151
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
HTML mail CAN do more than plaintext. Don't be willfully ignorant. You can format what you say, you can add images, and overall make an easier to read document.
If you want to send a document why not send an attachment?
Just because you can't control everything people send you anymore doesn't mean HTML mail is a bad thing, it means you have control issues.
This has nothing to do with control. I can block all HTML email messages if I want to. The problem is that it adds absolutely no benefit at all. If you need a structured document there are better options than HTML in an email.
This topic is going down the tubes. And I honestly feel the unreasonable ones are the people who have such a strong irrational hatred of something that could be useful to other people.
I wouldn't say useful but rather over used. How often do you save documents as HTML? I don't see it being the document type of choice for anyone so why try to use it for something it was never designed for when there are better options?