Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Fri 7th Dec 2007 06:25 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Permalink for comment 289340
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-09-21
Yeah it all depends on whether the classes are worth the money. As a C++ developer, Qt is easily worth the money. It is so far above any other C++ toolkit out there that I believe I get my money back in gained productivity very quickly.
In Java you already have classes for network/sql/xml/file/etc access in the standard class library so a lot of Qt is not strictly necessary.
Trolltech seems to realize this and charges significantly less for Jambi than the C++ version of Qt ($1780-$3560 vs $3300-$6600).