Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Jul 2005 17:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 2910
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
The ACL concepts & extensive usage of them is more advanced than anything in the Unix world.
That's not true. Take a look these:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux
http://www.grsecurity.net
http://www.rsbac.de
That's just linux. You'll find ACL's in Solaris and BSD too.
There really isn't that much that's wrong with the Windows NT on the system itself
Except for the fact that a program crash can take the entire system down.