Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Dec 2007 23:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 291415
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-11
"If Redhat or one of the other Linux players at the time has sponsored the project, I don't doubt we could have had a superior Compiz or a better-performing, eye-candy-heavy,
competitor to Vista's Aero - 5 years ago."
Well, I do. Do you know the background of Compiz, and related important X server extensions like Render, Composite and Damage? A long story made short: X development has stagnated for years because the core team was too conservative and resisted progressive changes. The changes in the X server, necessary to support 3D compositing, would never have been accepted by the XFree86 developers. That's also the reason why XFree86 eventually forked into X.org, and only in recent years has development started to gain some speed again.
The problem was not technological, it was political. Sponsoring Rasterman would not have helped the situation.