
Richard Stallman sent a message to OpenBSD-Misc, explaining
why he doesn't recommend OpenBSD.
"From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software (though I am not sure whether it contains any non-free firmware blobs). However, its ports system does suggest non-free programs, or at least so I was told when I looked for some BSD variant that I could recommend. I therefore exercise my freedom of speech by not including OpenBSD in the list of systems that I recommend to the public." His mail started a
huge thread (that's just page 1) and since then he's under a blast of messages from Theo de Raadt and the OpenBSD users.
De Raadt replied:
"Richard, you are wrong. You said very clearly in your interview that the ports tree contains non-free software. It does not. It is just a scaffold of Makefiles containing URLs, and an occasional patch here or there. You are just plain wrong. And you are not enough of a man to admit that you are wrong. I may be unfriendly at times, but you are a power-misusing hypocritical liar who attacks projects that try harder than any others to only make free software available. Shame on you."
Member since:
2006-03-23
He hadn't done proper research before posting but he wasn't afraid to ask for clarification even when some people started accusing his recommended gNewSense. And in the matter of recommending OpenBSD he turned out to be right, as justified in one of the earlier posts (http://osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=19057&comment_id=291721)