Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Sep 2005 19:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 29247
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Windows uses a file system called NTFS, today's Linux distributions primarily use ext3, and like two warring tribes, the two barely speak.<Br>
I know, it must have been a party friday, or just a slow saturday morning :] Anyway, first, distributions don't use any filesystem primarily, at most they give you half a dozen choices with one or another as default. That may be ext3, or not. As for Windows not supporting any linux file system natively, correct (only one or two third party drivers and apps exist, like limited ext2/ext3 read/write and a reiser driver with very limited features and fequent BSOD), as for Linux not supporting Windows file systems, not really correct (think fat,vfat with read/write and reading ntfs natively, without third party support).<Br>
That said, this Paragon stuff looks cool, but I wouldn't pay for such a thing, instead I'll remain with my usual fat32 buffer partitions for data transfer.
What I would pay for is a full-featured (with access rights, full read/write support, no BSOD) native xfs filesystem driver for Windows.