Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Dec 2007 21:11 UTC, submitted by Kaj de Vos
Permalink for comment 293171
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Could you elaborate your point about xcb design, I didn't understand it..
>>Since most people use X on desktop, it should have been developed for desktop and the networking stuff could be implemented as an extension.<<
Sorry but on office desktops, network transparency is really useful, so I like the network transparency "by default" design.
>>Noone even uses native X over the network because it's so damn slow.<<
So I'm 'noonne'? Unless you restrict a network to Internet, I'm using X over a LAN each day at work..
Blatant exaggerations make really hard to take your points seriously, you know..
>>Also when you drag X windows you can sometimes see subwindows jerking because of synchronisation issues.<<
It's nice that you care about this issue and you try to fix it but frankly, I personally couldn't care less about this issue and wouldn't trade network transparency for a fix to this issue.