Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Jan 2008 23:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 295127
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
While it doesn't "belong to him alone" he has the ultimate word on what code is accepted into the official kernel. If Linux says no to GPLv3 code no such code will go into the official kernel. "
That's true and that's how it should be - Linus' opinion rightfully carries tremendous weight. But that wasn't what I argued. I argued that Linus cannot change the kernel license all by himself - or at least not without rewriting all of the code to which the original authors hold the copyright.
But apparently stating this rubs people the wrong way and causes relentless downmodding shrugs