Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Jan 2008 22:34 UTC, submitted by vermaden
"Open source code, much like its commercial counterpart, tends to contain one security exposure for every 1000 lines of code, according to a program launched by the Department of Homeland Security to review and tighten up open source code's security. Popular open source projects, such as Samba, the PHP, Perl, and Tcl dynamic languages used to bind together elements of Web sites, and Amanda, the popular open source backup and recovery software running on half a million servers, were all found to have dozens or hundreds of security exposures and quality defects. A total of 7826 open source project defects have been fixed through the Homeland Security review, or one every two hours since it was launched in 2006, according to David Maxwell, open source strategist for Coverity, maker of the source code checking system, the Prevent Software Quality System, that's being used in the review." Note: I just want to state for the record that the headline has not been written by me. I do like the total kicking-in-open-doors air surrounding it, though.
Permalink for comment 295136
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2005-11-18
Without arguing for either side of the fence. The argument goes that more eyes make bugs shallow. More people read and check prominent code from open source projects, so there is a higher probability to find bugs.
Of course, in practice it highly depends on the project. While "the more eyes make bugs shallow" mantra works for open source projects with a high number of developers, it may not apply to projects with few developers.
Additionally, it should be pointed out that Coverity's software does static analysis. It does not uncover (security) bugs that can not be detected with static analysis.