Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jan 2008 23:14 UTC
Permalink for comment 295289
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Canonical went down this road because (as one Ubuntu developer put it) there was no way they were going to guarantee that KDE 3 was going to be worked on and supported until 2011. KDE 4's release is the reason for this; a lot of development is shifting to KDE 4, and Canonical doesn't want to risk components of KDE 3 going unmaintained at any time during the 3 year support cycle.
And besides, Canonical has hinted at 8.10 (with KDE 4.1) being Kubuntu's LTS instead. I'd hardly say a different support/release schedule for Kubuntu means Canonical is not interested in KDE; it's just more business as usual considering it's no secret Canonical puts more of their effort behind GNOME.