Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Jan 2008 11:57 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 295359
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
For me, 2 core, 4 core or 8 core doesn't make a difference. HOWEVER, I'd like these hardware corporations to make boot FASTER. When I start my computer, I have to wait 30 seconds before I can work. On the other hand, when I switch on a cell phone, it takes...A second. I know the BIOS needs to check all hardware, then the OS needs to load, etc... But still, there are ways to make it much faster (ie: assume no HW has changed, don't check HW changes unless the user asks for it, keep the OS in some sort of non-volatile RAM, etc...).