Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Jan 2008 14:41 UTC, submitted by superstoned
KDE "I think it's really necessary to respond to some criticism seen on the reactions to the latest OSnews article. I won't go into the article itself, imho it's rather negative, but hey. From an user's perspective, it makes sense to only review 3 or 4 parts of KDE 4 and complain about them, and ignore all the other brilliant pieces of work in there, right? On to the responses, I found this reaction by dagw to be the most typical. Well. That's painful. So, is he right? Did we make the wrong decision? Let's look at it from a broader perspective for a while. Let's see it in the Grand Scheme of Things to Come."
Permalink for comment 295846
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
i don't get it
by vege on Mon 14th Jan 2008 15:01 UTC
Member since:

I don't get why release version numbers are so important. You won't drop or use it becouse of a number. You will decide if it is for you or not.

As long as it is not a forced update, so it simply just does not metter how they call it.

I hope, 4.1 will be a pack I'd like to use. 4.0 is not. I'm not confused - woo-hoo! ;)

Reply Score: 6