Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Jan 2008 21:20 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 297649
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-07
Thom, did you not catch the error in their writeup?
"Flash filesystem (FFS) specialist Datalight Inc. will soon release a commercial Linux FFS claimed to provide 400 percent the write performance and 500 percent the mount speed of JFFS2." (emphasis mine)
This is supposed to be supported by later reporting:
"Datalight claims that in early tests of its new Linux FFS it has measured mount times of 0.44 seconds on a 56 MB NAND flash chip, compared to 2.32 seconds for JFFS2 and 0.69 seconds for YAFFS2. "
But '500 percent' of something is 5x something, which means that the new Linux FFS should be 11.6 seconds. It should in fact say that it is 500% faster.