Linked by Anton Klotz on Fri 25th Jan 2008 13:14 UTC
Permalink for comment 297994
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-10
You're looking at this issue through the eyes of the common consumer instead of seeing it through the eyes of a business. By opening OS X Apple could increase it's revenue for both Apple and their shareholders since the majority of companies want ease of migration. Do you really believe a company with over 200 employees is going to take Apple seriously knowing that they would need to spend even more money replacing their current workstations just so they can run OS X? Both competing OS Linux and Windows allow the consumer to install on existing hardware, not force them to buy the software with a new workstation. While I enjoy using OS X I do also admit it would benefit businesses to have Apple revise their EULA to allow it to be installed on other Intel based workstations. Companies could pay Apple for a license to allow OS X to be installed across a LAN similar to how Microsoft prices licenses for business installations of Windows Vista. The point here being that it would be another market for Apple to increase their profits as well lower cost to businesses who want to migrate to OS X.
Edited 2008-01-27 18:20 UTC