Linked by Anton Klotz on Fri 25th Jan 2008 13:14 UTC
This article is about new aspects of the never-ending story of how Apple is protecting MacOS X for running on different hardware than Apple's. The keyword is virtualization, which allows running unmodified version of Mac OS X as virtualized instance.
Permalink for comment 298088
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2006-01-10
I have read various EULAs and most open source licenses (every EULA for every piece of software I have installed on my computers, every open source license for every piece of open source software I have downloaded to read or compile). I asked nothing of the word of the licenses, I asked for clarification of the laws governing them. Both are contracts, yet both are governed differently (yes, every license is a contract), and this difference, with provisions for each, is what I am asking about.
Also, your use of "should" will most certainly kill your argument, as "should" and "does" are completely different, and in arguments of existing practice, "should" is an opinion with no base. (Just some FYI for your next debate).