Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2008 23:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 298683
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
There are a few distinctions that are not so silly. One big one is apps. My ultra portable laptop is capable of running the same apps (and OS) as my desktop, making transfering work from one to the other trivial.
Another is size and battery life. I wouldn't want a phone big enough to have a useable keyboard or powerful enough to run my desktop apps. I want my phone to be small enough to live unnoticed in my pocket and 'weak' enough to be on and opperating for days without charging.
As to seamless connectivity, as long as both your phone and your laptop have bluetooth they both have seamless connectivity. Secondly having features that rely on data connectivity to work is not a great idea. Have you ever checked how much your carrier charges to connect to the internet via 3G from a foreign country. If your carrier is anything like mine, you'll know it's prohibitivly expensive (I realize this is more of a problem in Europe than in the US).