Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st Feb 2008 13:00 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Permalink for comment 298895
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
I don't see how Microsoft is going to digest this infrastructure. Are they going to waste time and money converting Yahoo's PHP/BSD/Linux infrastructure to .NET and Windows? If they do, it's going to be a drag on further growth of this part of their business. If they don't, it'll be a major blow to Microsoft's campaign against open source and be a validation by Microsoft itself that PHP is a better choice over ASP for large scalable web architecture, and BSD is better than Windows. And they won't be able to integrate with their MSN stuff. Not to mention, everyone who worked in the MSN division of Microsoft is probably feeling a bit betrayed by this move.
I don't think the business/marketing people who probably decided to do this really thought about the technical implications and how it could affect Microsoft developer's perception of Windows and .NET.