Linked by Michael Reed on Thu 7th Feb 2008 17:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 299961
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-12
I keep getting perturbed when people like the author keep passing on the misinformation. Microsoft no longer owns OS/2 code. When IBM was going to go the "distribution" route Microsoft signed off on it and IBM went their separate ways. IBM does not want to open source OS/2 for a few reasons, the most important being they don't want to cannibalize themselves. They support Linux, their software stack, their support staff and I'm willing to put it that over 85% of their customers are Linux customers. Despite the fact that IBM could do a FULL SOURCE RELEASE, it would be a lot of work and IBM doesn't want to compete against itself. I wouldnt be surprised to later on see a customized version of Linux dubbed OS/2 with with either WPS ported or just a gussied up theme for GNOME. After all OS/2 is a respected brand and thats something to take advantage of.