Linked by Michael Reed on Thu 7th Feb 2008 17:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 300465
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-02-11
I have used OS/2 since the 1.0 release on a PS/2 286 with a wopping 4 MB of RAM and since OS/2 4.0 I haven't seen any OS coming close to the multitasking and multithreading performance OS/2 delivered.
The stability of the OS was always guaranteed whether or not a program crashed. I haven't found this capability in any other OS so far, not in BSD, not in Linux variants and alas certainly not in Windows.
If there is one thing other OS's could learn from OS/2 it is the multithreading and multitasking model incorporated in OS/2. Outdated? Maybe. Surpassed? Not even close.