Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Feb 2008 13:24 UTC, submitted by wakeupneo
Permalink for comment 301672
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-30
It's interesting how vastly different people's perception of video and audio quality is.
A friend of mine has a nice large HD TV, and HD material makes a huge difference in quality - particularly with movies that has complex and detailed scenes. That's not my opinion, that's a fact. Or so I would like to think.... -
When we started watching the film 300 on his setup, I reacted to the quality immediately - he hadn't even told me that it was HD yet, because we'd been watching "normal" resolution material earlier - while another one of my friends looked at the screen and wondered what I was so worked up about; to him it looked like any DVD movie.
As another example, my mother was perfectly happy with the quality of the sound system in her car - a cassette recorder connected to a mono speaker positioned under the driver's seat. I could hardly make out which song she was listening to, but she was perfectly happy with it.
Again, it's interesting that people have such different demands on video and audio quality. If everyone was like my mother, not many HD sets would be sold.