Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 22nd Feb 2008 09:16 UTC, submitted by obsethryl
.NET (dotGNU too) "Previously, we have presented one of the two opensource licensed projects related to creating a C# kernel. Now it's the time to complete the set by rightfully presenting SharpOS, an effort to build a GPL version 3 + runtime exception licensed system, around a C# kernel of their own design. It is my pleasure and priviledge to host a set of questions and answers from four active developers of SharpOS, that is William Lahti, Bruce Markham, Mircea - Cristian Racasan and Sander van Rossen in order to get some insight into what they are doing with SharpOS, their goals, their different design and inspiration."
Permalink for comment 301986
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: So what ?
by J.R. on Fri 22nd Feb 2008 13:01 UTC in reply to "RE: So what ?"
J.R.
Member since:
2007-07-25

"Could anyone tell me what is so amazing about C# ?
Seriously, what wonderful things shall I wait for ?


It's not C# in and of itself that is "so amazing", although it seems to be a fairly well designed language. The cool thing is the CLR, C# is just a way of using the CLR.
"

Perhaps in this scenario (OS) its the CLR that is the cool thing, but I have to argue that C# (and the .NET class library) itself is rather amazing. Ofcourse you have to compare it with something in order to draw that conclusion.

For me, which are educated as C++ and Java programmer, I just love the fact that C# is as powerful as both those languages together. Its as simple (both in language features and level of abstraction) as Java, yet got all the features of C++ (unsafe code). It got a clean class library with the same features as Java's, but without all the legacy/compatibility code and overengineered factoryfactory factories classes...and much better feature-set than any C++ library I have ever used. Abstraction for rapid application development and readability, is worth its weight in gold for alot of programmers (especially in the enterprise market where it has to fit within the business models and so on...).

Last but not least, anyone still using C/C++ for applications and then gets rooted because some stupid buffer overflow can only blame themselves. It has been known for ages that code written in C/C++ WILL lead to these problems...even at the hands of experienced programmers. If you ever written a C++ code with more than 1000 lines, don't come here and tell me you never had dangling pointers, insufficient bounds checking, string formating errors, and what not in your code... I certainly have. Getting these kinds of problems OUT from the core of the operating system should be enough reason to embrace C# (or any other similar language) at once.

Reply Parent Score: 5