Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Feb 2008 22:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 302378
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-05
Web developers care about standards compliance, it has been shown that noone else really does.
What is important is that using IE6, especially pre XP SP2 was downright dangerous to peoples computers, and the word really got around. People were more then willing to put up with the performance issues of firefox if it meant that surfing the web didn't infest their machines with spyware. If MS makes a big enough splash with IE8, FF may start losing some of its windows base.
Honestly, if this boils down to technical superiority, my bets are on webkit. They need a better javascript engine, but when that comes their speed will beat IE (and totally pants FF), and their codebase is far cleaner then anything else out there.