Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Mar 2008 17:54 UTC, submitted by RJop
Permalink for comment 304790
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-04-28
Reading that link you posted, I find it strange that the developers of Xvid and FFMpeg don't think that SSE4 will make any difference for them. I've seen a benchmark using SSE4 optimized applications (TMPEGEnc and VirtualDub) for video encoding and the gains were 30%-40% when running on the SSE4 enabled Intel Penryn processors as compared to the previous generation.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3195&p=4