Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Mar 2008 20:41 UTC, submitted by John Mills
Permalink for comment 305046
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-11-27
I have very limited experience with monodevelop, but this is my experience:
Good:
1. Good intellisense, feels much faster than eclipse.
2. Native toolkits gtk# for linux and winforms for windows. I think a common gui over platforms are futile, it will never excel, because it can't make use of existing infrastructure.
3. Decent documentation.
4. C# is a produktive language - a improved clone of Java, and .net class library is good.
5. Best of all I don't need to use make files! one of the things that has kept me from programming in linux - I HATE MAKEFILES!!!
Bad:
1. No debugger, BIG PROBLEM!
2. As late as the Release candidate, monodevelop tended to crash quite often.
3. ASP.NET support is very incomplete.
4. .net 2.0 support is incomplete (from what I have heard).