Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Mar 2008 21:43 UTC
Permalink for comment 305947
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-13
That's absolutely nothing. The only way you will circumvent the OEM channel that Microsoft controls is to create a freely available desktop distribution that will have a chance of creating a desktop market for you.
"
Don't confuse the consumer market with the commercial market. Enterprises don't care about OEM preloading. More often than not, they image systems themselves before deploying anyways. And if they've decided to deploy linux, they've done so after testing it against their hardware. They don't leave installation and configuration issues up to the users.
They also don't want freely available desktops. They're quite happy to pay a fee for them, because they want a number to call if something goes wrong, and they don't want to rely on everyone running apt-get update daily to make sure the systems are patched and stable.
What they care about is manageability, supportability, and the availability to minimize workflow disruption for things like application compatibility. The first two points are easily addressed, the third one is where linux still is weak. Not as weak as it once was, but I'll be the first to admit that linux still has challenges there.
Pre-loading is really irrelevant in this space, though. Having systems tested and certified for compatibility carries far more weight, and the tier-1s already do that.
SAP are trying to sell to the SME market? Excuse me while I get back on my chair. "
Everybody is targeting the SME market. Execution is a completely different argument, and many of the enterprise-class ISV's are failing miserably, but they're all still trying to get a piece of that pie.