Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Mar 2008 21:26 UTC, submitted by ohxten
Permalink for comment 306904
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-04
During my daily visit to programming.reddit.com, I found this item that struck me as pretty amusing.
http://reddit.com/r/programming/info/6dj0k/comments/
http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2008/03/26/acid3-is-basically-wor...
Acid3 is basically worthless
I was looking over the spreadsheet covering Mozilla's Acid3 failures, and it struck me that very few of the fixes would substantially improve the Web or the browser. They are bugs and they will be fixed (except maybe SMIL... wtf?), but they don't impact authors or users at all. Looks mostly like an opportunity for grandstanding about "commitment to standards." I think testing createNodeIterator while text nodes don't interoperate is both misguided and hypocritical.
Besides, commitment to standards is strong at Mozilla, where we don't constantly seek to rubber stamp our own implementation.
There's another reddit.com thread saying that since Firefox 3 is in its final stages of development, they will be fixing no Acid3 bugs for Firefox 3, which is a sensible policy.
http://reddit.com/r/programming/info/6dk68/comments/
Edited 2008-03-27 17:43 UTC