Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Apr 2008 21:10 UTC, submitted by Kaj de Vos
Permalink for comment 309589
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
I've managed to kill one in a week although my 2nd one seems to be working well after about 2 months. I've only installed xp this time instead of trying for debian et al. The flash drive just doesn't seem like it will last long.
When i get a few days off i'll have a go at xubuntu installing from a usb key instead of a usb cd drive. which hasn't been working well for me when trying to install linux.
The EEEpc is not a power user pc. I use it for taking notes at uni and for working on the train.
If you are worried about longevity of the flash drive, then installing XP on it would be the worst thing to do.
XP has only two choices for the filesystem ... FAT and NTFS. NTFS is not designed for flash drives, so FAT is more suitable ... but also more insecure (eg. no concepts of owner or user or permissions are supported by FAT).
The best option for the EEEPC flash disk would probably be LogFS.
http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/LogFS_A_Scalable_Flash_Filesystem
http://www.linux.com/feature/114295
I'm not sure if anyone has coupled a good lightweight Linux distribution (say XUbuntu ?) with LogFS as the root filesystem for the flash disk, but such a combination would be ideal for the EEEPC, it would be just the thing to answer your concerns about the durability of the flash SSD, and it would fit perfectly with your use for the machine of taking notes at uni and working on the train.
It would be a far, far better choice for you on your EEEPC ... and it would as a bonus be cheaper, more secure (wouldn't need anti-virus, for instance) and probably make the machine last longer and operate quite a bit faster as well.
PS: I would think the current Linux variants for the EEEPC would be using JFFS2 wouldn't they? Anyone know for sure?
At least this is designed for flash ... unlike NTFS or FAT.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JFFS2
Edited 2008-04-15 04:45 UTC