Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Apr 2008 20:12 UTC, submitted by Craig Barth
Microsoft "What Intel giveth, Microsoft taketh away. Such has been the conventional wisdom surrounding the Windows/Intel (aka Wintel) duopoly since the early days of Windows 95. In practical terms, it means that performance advancements on the hardware side are quickly consumed by the ever-increasing complexity of the Windows/Office code base. Case in point: Microsoft Office 2007, which, when deployed on Windows Vista, consumes more than 12 times as much memory and nearly three times as much processing power as the version that graced PCs just seven short years ago, Office 2000. Despite years of real-world experience with both sides of the duopoly, few organizations have taken the time to directly quantify what my colleagues and I at Intel used to call The Great Moore's Law Compensator (TGMLC). In fact, the hard numbers above represent what is perhaps the first-ever attempt to accurately measure the evolution of the Windows/Office platform in terms of real-world hardware system requirements and resource consumption. In this article I hope to further quantify the impact of TGMLC and to track its effects across four distinct generations of Microsoft's desktop computing software stack."
Permalink for comment 309862
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's capitalism, stupid
by Odisej on Wed 16th Apr 2008 12:15 UTC
Member since:

"It's capitalism, stupid." That could be the moto. Vista, OS X, Intel, bloat, horsepower and all other are, in my opinion, symptoms of the basic principles of capitalism. First you produce artificial "needs", than you sell "wants" and voila - a never ending spiral of consumerism. I don't expect Apple, Microsoft or any other company to change their ways. The only alternative that could brake the spiral - not in a short run though - is linux. That is my philosophical reason for using it. At least a part of it.

Reply Score: 5