Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Apr 2008 20:06 UTC, submitted by melkor
Linux "I came away from the second annual Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit with mixed feelings. I mean, it's hard not to support the group that pays Linus Torvalds to spend his time continuing to lead the poster-boy project for free and open source software. But at the same time, those golden chains are my biggest concern about the Linux Foundation."
Permalink for comment 310182
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Good article
by abraxas on Thu 17th Apr 2008 23:07 UTC in reply to "RE: Good article"
abraxas
Member since:
2005-07-07

If for some unfatomable reason you are constrained to run your desktop Linux on desktop hardware that was not necessarily originally designed to run Linux, then, unlike Vista or OSX, in many cases this is possible but it pays to check it out first:

Sorry but you lose. I am running an Intel Centrino based system, probably one of the most supported laptop hardware configurations. In fact most "linux compatible" laptops seem to be Centrino based, just check your own links. The simple fact is the wifi light just does not work with the iwlwifi drivers, the driver developers at Intel even know this. The same goes for Intel's framebuffer driver. It has issues with suspend. Then there are userspace issues that prevent me from using XVideo extensions with Compiz, which also has trouble with 3D programs. I'm glad that fixes for all these things are in the works but I'm getting pretty anxious now considering my laptop is now over a year old. Despite these drawbacks I would never go back to Windows and I'm sure I would have even more issues if I did.

Now back to my point. The Linux desktop is being ignored for the most part by Linux's biggest sponsors. The simple fact is Linux is much further along on the server side than it is on the desktop side and I think it's about time things evened up.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2