Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Apr 2008 16:19 UTC, submitted by WillM
Permalink for comment 310354
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-12-17
It's been fairly obvious for some time that the competition, or spectre of competition, from open source has forced Microsoft to change in little ways. Interoperability is mentioned as if Microsoft is thinking hard about it, but with the spectre of some ugly dealings over OOXML fresh in my memory, I won't be impressed by anything less than major glasnost and perestroika.
As for the stated vision, I see very little that Plan 9 couldn't do in 1989. Plan 9 still can, it's still around. In fact, I'm starting to wonder whether every time the word "vision" comes out of certain industries, whether it doesn't mean a rehash of a far older and proven idea, but one which of course received limited audience. Credit where credit is due... Oh I forgot, Microsoft needs all the positive publicity they can get right now. *sigh*