Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Apr 2008 19:00 UTC, submitted by Adam S
Permalink for comment 310898
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-07
But that is a whole other issue in itself...I'm against apps that integrate that much into the environment.
Carbon has always been billed as a transitional API. It was obvious right from the start that it wasn't always going to be available. It's purpose was to help developers port their existing applications to OS X, before transitioning to Cocoa.
Guess it didn't work too well, given how many commercial apps remained Carbon. It was only the announcement that there will be no 64 bit Carbon that has spurred these software houses like Adobe to start seriously looking at Cocoa.