Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Apr 2008 15:01 UTC
Legal When PsyStar announced they would be offering their own Macintosch clone, pre-installed with Apple's Mac OS X Leopard, they opened up a whole can of worms. Despite the fact that the company itself was shrouded in mystery and dubiousness, the possible implications of their actions sparkled an interesting debate here on OSNews as well as other discussion venues: can PsyStar and its users just discard Apple's End User License Agreement for Leopard? Instead of relying on my own limited layman's understanding of Dutch Common Law, I decided to contact Dutch legal experts, and ask for their opinions on Apple's EULA, and EULAs in general.
Permalink for comment 311497
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
This has been struck down before.
by jefro on Fri 25th Apr 2008 20:28 UTC
Member since:

This is the same as claiming one can only use a "brand name" of oil in a "brand name" outboard motor.

If I purchase and I don't mean lease software I will do what I want with it.

"Apple's" only recourse is to not honor it's warranty, not threaten me.

Edited 2008-04-25 20:30 UTC

Reply Score: 1