Linked by John Finigan on Mon 21st Apr 2008 19:00 UTC
Permalink for comment 311587
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Pulling a thread from an OpenSolaris forums with some random guy who decided to throw away an existing Veritas set up (worrying in itself) proves absolutely nothing.
You have no idea what ZFS detected. The thing is, you don't know what caused the problem or what it is. There is no evidence at all that there was a problem on the existing system either (and Veritas has multiple ways around this kind of failure). You don't know if moving off something to an unstable Solaris set up to use ZFS caused it, or if it's something else. There are too many variables.
'OMG, ZFS detected this!' tells you nothing, nor how to fix it, nor what the problem is. The point is, you have it. Look at the guy below who gets warnings and errors using the same controller.
I take it trouble shooting isn't in your repertoire?
If you decide to dump an existing and working storage solution and install an unstable Solaris OS derivative so you can technology wank over ZFS, I'd cut your ass off and throw it out of the window.
Some of you guys really worry me, you know?
Edited 2008-04-26 20:50 UTC