Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th Apr 2008 21:38 UTC, submitted by kiddo
Graphics, User Interfaces The trash can metaphor in computing is as old as the desktop metaphor itself. It was first introduced with the Apple Lisa user interface, and found its way to the Macintosh. Apple patented the whole idea, and sued anyone who tried to use the same name, resulting in other user interfaces implementing the exact same principle but just named differently. Despite its old age, and the fact it barely changed over the decades, many people have issues with the traditional concept.
Permalink for comment 311842
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
trash can - useless and drives to negligence
by l3v1 on Tue 29th Apr 2008 06:35 UTC
Member since:

Well, well, the good old trash can story. In my world, the trash can is a stupid idea. Why ? If you need something, don't delete it, if you have the tiniest hunch that one day you'll might need it then store it, backup it, save it for later days, and after backup, if there's no immediate need for it, then you might think about deletion. Hard drives are cheap, dvds are cheap. In my book there's no such thing as accidental deletion, there's only carelessness and stupidity. Hit me if you wish, I can take the punch.

I never used the trash/recycle bin/whatever, I always disable it if possible. I never in my life have lost or deleted anything I later wished I didn't. It's not a big deal actually to get used to think twice about your files. I managed to drive my non-techie sister to behave by this rule and since her 9+ years of computer use she never ever complained about deleting something "accidentally". Although I'm managing her backups, still, it's working.

In my profession it's imperative that I don't loose my files and data [research results, sometimes data coming from really long work, articles, and so on] yet I still need to find any real use for that trash/recycle bin thing. Oh, and "managing" the trash can, well, I find that whole concept a waste of time and resources.

Reply Score: 4