Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Apr 2008 10:36 UTC, submitted by Innova
Permalink for comment 311883
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-11-10
But it's not competing on price; it's competing on features.
If the Psystar had exactly equal specification, and every feature of a real Mac - but was still cheaper then it would be competing on price.
But it's not. It's not an iMac, nor a MacPro. Where's the webcam (iMac)? It's slower. OPTIONAL firewire. Integrated graphics on base configuration. No bluetooth, no mouse or keyboard.
Is it a Mac Mini? No bluetooth, no IR, the size doesn't even compare (the most important thing about the Mac Mini)
This isn't competing at all. It's just 'cheap'.
Edited 2008-04-29 11:34 UTC