Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Apr 2008 08:21 UTC, submitted by Jason Slack
Permalink for comment 311952
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-11-11
Are you referring to convictions done 20 years ago cleared by modern techniques? If so then yes, those convictions are not up to my standards.
Not quite sure where you are going with this. Are you recommending not going through the "process" today but keeping criminals in jail until it becomes faster and cheaper? What if when such time comes we'll find out that half of those people were in fact innocent?
And yet, here you are...