Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Apr 2008 12:55 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Permalink for comment 312175
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-24
No. That is a mischaracterization. Btrfs is intended to work closely *with* dm and lvm. A certain minimum amount of functionality is duplicated between btrfs and the current dm and lvm where absolutely necessary. Read what Chris says about this:
http://lwn.net/Articles/265533/
Edited 2008-04-30 17:59 UTC