Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd May 2008 20:52 UTC, submitted by irbis
Permalink for comment 312701
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-10-11
"it's the language of business and the language of science"
I'll not discuss the "language of business" part, however I will as for the "language of science" one. Except for Mathematics, there is no language for sciences.
Fun fact: a few years ago, the Chinese were very interested in learning French because they wanted to be able to read major medical publications in their native language.
Considering how inept the current high level (French) decision-makers are I'm not sure how that ended up, but the willingness was there.